In 2003, a hearing on the case “Lawrence v. Texas” was held which discussed the laws against sodomy and its impact on the equality of the citizens in the United States.

A similar case “Bowers v. Hardwick” occurred earlier – in 1986, but the Court did not uphold the plaintiffs, and the law remained. But now, owing to the decision of the justices of Kennedy, Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, and Breyer, it was recognized that it contradicts the 14 Amendment to the Constitution so that the anti-sodomy law was repealed.

I fully agree with the decision of the court because I believe that everyone has the right to privacy without harassment. The law should not discriminate against people regardless of their race, religion, and sexual preference. After all, the Constitution states: “No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States” (U.S. Const. amend. XIV).

I do not think the decision, taken by the Supreme Court based on public and international criticism, rather played the role that moral values and social principles in the world have changed for a long time. People now are on the same level and have enough freedom; thus, such laws look more than ridiculous. Moreover, the authority to dispose of one’s private life is closely guarded by the Constitution and the European Convention on Human Rights.

The case “Lawrence v. Texas” had a significant impact on the U.S. Following the decision, made regarding sodomy laws in Texas, similar laws were invalid in other states such as Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, etc. In 2009, in New York, it was agreed that homosexual contact in the United States is no longer a crime. Another significant contribution was made to the equity gap.

Looking for someone to write your research paper - ask for help from our research paper writers.
Best Price To Buy
Type of assignment
Writer level
Number of pages
Order total: $ 12.99
First order only: $ 11.04

Related essays

  1. Comparison of Approaches to the Relationship
  2. Cultural Anthropology
  3. The Case of Maryland v. Pringle
  4. Unit IV Case Study
Chat with Support