After slaves release in Massachusetts they receive lower social status than whites. This is expressed by the fact that they were legally free but actually whites had more civil rights than blacks. African Americans have equal civil rights however they could not be on a jury. Their children could not attend state schools, adults could not vote but they paid taxes. Sometimes to find work for slaves was easier than for freedmen, since masters presented their slaves in the means of employment. However, in Mississippi situation was much more complicated. There was a very small number of free blacks as a result of laws and racial prejudice. Free blacks were limited in moving into Mississippi by law controls. They were required to have certification for their free status. Free blacks were at greater risk in Mississippi if they do not have a registration certificate. In this case, they can be arrested and even get jail time. Relation to the Blacks in Mississippi was much tougher than in Massachusetts even after Blacks became free. It should also be noted, that the free black dress was much less than for a white, for the same job.

The abolition of slavery in the United States dealt a blow to the community both in social and economic spheres. Racial segregation is ingrained in the minds of the white population. It occurs in schools, public transport, army and much influenced by the ratio of Whites to Blacks, including those Whites who never owned slaves it has a number of reasons. After the abolition of slavery, the black population received civil rights. However, the possession of civil rights implies a certain personal maturity. Ruling class at all times aware, consciously or instinctively that education involves a freethinking. Blacks were taught the scriptures to, they meekly accepted their fate. Otherwise, most of the Negroes were as ignorant as children. Many have interpreted their rights as an opportunity not to work and to mock of the former owners. The white population at that time was more developed than the black one so there was a clear understanding of what would happen if Black did not achieve social maturity and had the freedom and civil rights. This was one of the main reasons that most white people who did not own slaves objected to the presence of any African Americans either slave or free.

Gabriel Prosser, Denmark Vesey and Nat Turner are people whose effectiveness is difficult to judge. Responding to a question about the effectiveness of these people necessary to answer the question as to how effective the death? Whether their deaths on the gallows or the deaths of their supporters were effective? Whether the deaths of those white people who were killed during the uprisings were effective? Certainly activity of Gabriel Prosser, Denmark Vesey and Nat coach influenced the process of liberation of black people from slavery, but the cost was high. Was it a positive or negative influence? When socially immature largely uneducated group of people, it does not matter black or white, takes up arms, it is always scary, not effective and leads to tragic consequences whatever good purpose they pursued. The reaction of the white men to the armed uprising was so obvious and the rebels who feared retaliation for earlier prepared their line of retreat. It is therefore absolutely safe to say that violent methods are not effective to achieve something. This will become obvious when humanity finally realizes the price of human life.

William Lloyd Garrison was a radical minded abolitionist. In 1837 he rejected church and state, accepted the doctrine of Christian perfectionism (moral improvement), which promoted the idea of abolitionism, women's equality, and pacifism. He believed the U.S. political system is deeply corrupt and its relation to the law and the U.S. Constitution reflected the fact that in 1854 he publicly burned the following texts, the Fugitive Slave Act (Fugitive Slave Act of 1850) and the U.S. Constitution. For his abolitionist ideas in December 1831 by the state legislature in Georgia was reward of $ 5,000 for his head. His radicalism led to the crisis of the American Anti-Slavery, most members came out of it, when Harrison insisted on adopting a resolution of approval to the society of women. While South hated Lloyd Garrison, the northern U.S. treated him more loyal, because he supported the abolition of slavery, called for the military defeat of the South, and welcomed Lincoln Proclamation of Emancipation Proclamation.

Related essays

  1. Components of the Civil Rights Movement
  2. Compare the Descriptions of the Indians
  3. Common Sense
  4. Reconstruction
Chat with Support