Before you will read a book review sample from our professional writers, let us mention that if you are not strong in book review writing, our book review service can help you. Our professionals will write your paper on any deadline and at fair prices. Put the requirements of your book review assignment into order form or contact our customer support service through online chat on E-Mail.

In his book The Nine, Jeffrey Toobin analyses in detail the Supreme Court of the United States of America and discusses the landmark cases that have become judicial precedents. The personalities of the various individuals attached to the court are also mentioned by the author. Toobin places the Supreme Court in the middle of the White House decisions as well as the state departments.

Talk to an operator! icon
Want an expert write a paper for you?

The first major case that has survived and kept to its ruling is the case of Roe vs. Wade. The reverse of its ruling would ban abortion in America. The case was filed in 1973 by Linda Coffee and Sarah Weddington on behalf of Jane Roe, a resident of Dallas. The defendant was Henry Wade, Dallas county attorney. It is an abortion case, according to which the plaintiff could not travel out of the state due to the pregnancy, and so she needed to terminate it in a safe medical environment.

The court ruling of Roe vs. Wade was made according to the argument that a woman decided to abort.  Mentioning the right to privacy in the Constitution does not expressly grant it or give a list of what is private. After the interpretation, the court concluded that the right to terminate a pregnancy is a private decision of an individual. Therefore, the woman was permitted to do an abortion. The decisions of the court ruled that the state law that prohibited abortion except for saving the life of the mother was unconstitutional. The case is a landmark that affects the later rulings of the American courts on the cases of abortion. Its verdict reflects judicial liberalism in the judicial system (Toobin 12).

Another case considered by Toobin is the case of Brown vs. Board of Education. The case of 1954 held in its ruling that segregation or rather separation of children to different public schools by the virtue of skin color went “...against the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment”. Though the decisions did not expressly eliminate the segregation, it did put a landmark against racial segregation that was widespread in most of the American states.

Free Extras
  • Free plagiarism report (on request)
  • Free revision (within 2 days)
  • Free title page
  • Free bibliography
  • Free outline (on request)
  • Free email delivery
  • Free formatting
We Guarantee
  • Quality research and writing
  • BA, MA and PhD degree writers
  • 100% confidentiality
  • No hidden charges
  • Never resold works
  • 100% authenticity
  • 24/7/365 Customer Support
Free formatting
  • 12pt. Times New Roman
  • Double/Single-spaced papers
  • 1inch margins
  • Any citation style
  • Fully referenced papers
  • Up-to-date sources

Oliver Brown, a representative of the plaintiff, was denied a place for his child in Topeka white school, Kansas.  Brown filed a case against the school board that was dismissed by the Federal District Court under the precedent of Plessey vs. Fergusson(1896). According to the latter case, it was held that segregated institutions were equal. The Supreme Court in an appeal held that there was a violation of the Equal Protection Clause. The court found that blacks were discriminated against. The plaintiff obtained justice in a later 1958 case; the Supreme Court ruled that integration should be in schools, and Plessey's case decision was overruled. Though this case was not decided for the plaintiff immediately, it was a major step towards integration and the end of racial segregation.

As a landmark of the end of police brutality, Tobin explores the case of Miranda vs. Arizona. It was in 1966 that the Supreme Court held that a suspect had a right to a legal counselor”. It was also held that the police went against the fifth amendment of a prisoner’s right to remain silent. Further, the prisoners should be notified before questioning that everything they speak can be used against them. The case is very important today as it sets what has been referred to as Miranda’s law.

step 1
Step 1
Place an order
arrow
step 2
Step 2
Safe and Secure
Payment Procedure
arrow
step 3
Step 3
Communication
policies
arrow
step 4
Step 4
Downloading the
Completed Order
arrow
step 5
Step 5
Leave your
Feedback

Ernesto Miranda was arrested on March 13, 1963, on the allegations of rape, kidnapping, and robbery. Miranda was not given a chance to use his rights but was questioned by the police who waived his rights to confess and agree to the accusations.  Chief Justice Earl Warren dismissed the confession as evidence in the court trial as it has been taken when the basic rights of the plaintiff had been waived without his consent. In an increasingly dramatic police world that has a power bestowed upon them by the state, Miranda’s case protected fundamental individual rights enjoyed by modern American society.

There are many cases and surprises described in Toobin’s book. Narrated in a way that attracts scholars concerned in the field of law and those interested in courtroom matters, The Nine presents its readers with cases connected with the Supreme Court and its operations. Abortion, political discrimination, and different police issues affect the daily life of the citizens. Change of approach towards these issues will have a tremendous effect on society. The shocking realization is that many Americans would talk of abortion keep in mind the concepts put forward in the case of Roe vs. Wade. Overruling such a case would definitely affect the issue of abortion as well as the whole nation.

Talk to an operator! icon
Want an expert write a paper for you?

The most disappointing fact is that the “Supreme Court is driven on the lines of conservatism and liberalism”. Namely, a judge’s verdict can depend on his/her political convictions. Even though the cases depend on judicial precedents by their ruling, the personality traits of the judges still influence the decisions. One ruling of the judge can be overruled by another one based on a personal view of a problem.

It should be mentioned that the future of the Supreme Courts and their decisions depend on the personal traits of the elected Presidents and Senators who appoint the judges. The latter should always keep in mind the precedents of cases. People differ according to their philosophies, ideologies, and ethics and this also influences their decisions.

Need a writer who can write your book review? Ask for help from our book review service!

Best Price To Buy
Type of assignment
Writer level
Urgency
Number of pages
Order total: $ 12.99
First order only: $ 11.04

Related essays

  1. Family in Question
  2. Three Legacies of The Black Death
  3. Major in Success
Chat with Support